Cakeaway

244 Fog Ln, Didsbury, Manchester M20 6EL, UK Cake Shop
Decent
B-

Industry median 80 Top 10% start at 92 10 points below median

How this score is calculated

What This Means

Cakeaway scores 70 of 100, a B- grade, which the scale reads as decent. That is below the current median of 80 across audits run with this tool.

The strongest areas are Photos & Visual Content at 100 of 100 and Review Volume at 100 of 100.

One category needs urgent attention: Review Rating at 10 of 100. Scores under 30 mark a gap significant enough to hold back the areas that are working.

Resolving the 3 quick wins below is worth 4 points on this scale, which would move the score to 74 of 100 and a B- grade.

Quick Wins (The Fastest Fixes)

Only 1/3 NAP fields match between the website and GBP
Website & Online Presence

Only 1/3 NAP fields match between the website and GBP. Ensure the Name, Address, and Phone are identical everywhere.

High impact, about 15 minutes, worth 13 category points
The website does not use HTTPS
Website & Online Presence

The website does not use HTTPS. This is a critical trust signal for both Google and customers. Get an SSL certificate.

High impact, about 45 minutes, worth 15 category points
Reviews in the Google sample highlight "love", "amazing"
Review Sentiment & Quality

Reviews in the Google sample highlight "love", "amazing". Emphasize these strengths in the marketing.

Medium impact, about 15 minutes
What's Possible

These fixes lift the score to 74

This is what the fixes above are worth, added up. Each one carries the exact number of points it is currently costing this profile, weighted the same way the audit weights every category.

Score today 70
After these 3 wins 74

Aim for 90 or higher to earn the Excellence Award

GBPcentral issues a Gold Excellence Award to businesses scoring 90 or higher on this audit and meeting the full published criteria for their business category. Businesses scoring 95 or higher and meeting the stricter Platinum criteria may earn the Platinum tier. Working through this report's Quick Wins and Critical Issues is the fastest route there.

Critical Issues

Google Policy Check

Google's Business Profile guidelines ask for the real-world business name in the name field, with services, locations, and marketing wording kept in the fields built for them. This matters because Google can suspend listings over name issues, and a suspension would take everything this report measures offline with it. This check reads the name as Google currently publishes it and does not affect the score above.

The business name follows Google's naming guidelines
No added keywords, services, locations, or promotional wording were detected in the published name.

Category Scores

Business Name
Present
Address
Complete
Phone Number
Present
Website
Present
Business Hours
Set
Business Status
Operational
Editorial Summary
Not Available
Primary Category
Set
Additional Categories
Good
Category Specificity
Mixed
Photos Detected
10+
Status
Excellent
Industry Benchmark
10-20 typical for Restaurants & Food
Note
Google reports at most 10 photo references for a listing. A listing showing 10 may hold many more, so this category is scored within that limit and does not distinguish between them.

What to do

  1. Google's public data reports at most 10 photos, so we cannot see the full library. Listings in Restaurants & Food typically carry 10 to 20 photos. Keep adding current photos across the exterior, interior, team, and what the business sells.
Review Count
1209
Status
Excellent
Industry Benchmark
20-100 average for Restaurants & Food
Average Rating
1.8
Based On
1209 reviews
Status
Critical

What to do

  1. The rating is 1.8. Higher ratings improve the odds of appearing in local search results. Target 4.3+ to be competitive in the market.
  2. Focus on improving service quality. Address the root causes of negative reviews.
Reviews in Google Sample
5 of 1209 total
Detailed Reviews in Sample (50+ words)
4
Themes in Sample (Positive)
love, amazing
Themes in Sample (Negative)
rude, avoid

Based on the up-to-five reviews Google returns for the listing, sorted by Google's relevance algorithm rather than by date. Themes and sentiment reflect that sample, not the full review history.

What to do

  1. Reviews in the Google sample highlight "love", "amazing". Emphasize these strengths in the marketing.
  2. Reviews in the Google sample mention "rude", "avoid". Address these issues operationally to improve the rating.
Hours Published
Yes
Coverage
Complete
Secondary Hours
Not Set
Active Management
Standard

What to do

  1. Set special hours for upcoming holidays or documented exceptions to the normal schedule. This is a visible signal to Google that the listing is actively managed.
Website URL
http://www.cakeaway.uk/
Reachable
Yes
SSL (HTTPS)
Missing
Server Response Time
565 ms
Note
Measured as time to first byte. Full page load including images, fonts, and scripts will be slower.
Mobile Responsive
Yes
Name Match (Website/GBP)
Match
Address Match (Website/GBP)
Mismatch
Phone Match (Website/GBP)
Mismatch
Schema.org Markup
Present
Schema Detail
Partial

What to do

  1. The website does not use HTTPS. This is a critical trust signal for both Google and customers. Get an SSL certificate.
  2. Only 1/3 NAP fields match between the website and GBP. Ensure the Name, Address, and Phone are identical everywhere.
  3. The Schema.org markup is present but missing key details (address and telephone). Add a complete address and telephone property so search engines can reconcile the structured data with the GBP listing.
Engaged Attributes
7 of 20 relevant
Active Attributes
Payment Options, Delivery, Takeout, Curbside Pickup, Breakfast, Restroom
Indicated As Not Offered
Accessibility Options

What to do

  1. This profile engages 7 of 20 attributes relevant to the business type. Setting the remaining 13 attributes gives Google a fuller picture: Parking Options, Dine-in, Reservations, Lunch, Dinner.
  2. Accessibility information is on file but indicates no wheelchair-accessible features. If any are available, update the listing, because accessibility features are a strong local-search signal.

Add this badge to the business website

Show site visitors this Google Business Profile score and let them open the full report. Pick a style and theme, then paste the code where you want the badge to appear.

Style
Theme
Embed code
<a href="https://gbpcentral.com/audit/report/Bzuhnne0HGA?utm_source=badge&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=gbp_score_badge" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://gbpcentral.com/audit/badge/Bzuhnne0HGA.svg?style=horizontal&amp;theme=light" alt="GBP Score: 70 out of 100 (grade B-), audited by GBPcentral" width="280" height="104" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%;height:auto">
</a>

Paste this where you want the badge to appear.

Local Visibility Map

See where this business actually ranks in Google local results at 9 points around its location, using its own category as the search. One click, about half a minute.

This audit was generated on Jul 24, 2026. Google may hold newer data for this business now.

Go Further with GBPcentral

One platform for the work this report measures: posts, reviews, analytics, and profile health.

Most relevant for this profile
Review Management Tools

Review rating scored 10/100. Response tracking and alerts drive the steady work that lifts it.

Post Scheduling & Automation

Scheduled posts keep the profile active week after week.

Performance Analytics

Views, clicks, calls, and direction requests over time.

Profile Health Monitoring

A live score that flags profile gaps as they appear.

Multi-Location Management

Every location managed from one dashboard.

Explore all features

Talk to a GBP Specialist

Want to go beyond the basics? Our team can review these audit results and identify advanced optimization opportunities specific to this business.

Book a Free Consultation

About this report

Data source
Provided by Google
Generated
Jul 24, 2026 2:50 AM
Scoring engine
GBPcentral 4.2 How scores work

Represent this business? You can ask for it to be excluded from search engine promotion and award consideration.

Request exclusion